Picksmith
Menu
Home
Research Latest high conviction ideaPick RankingFree ResearchCEO Central
WatchlistsStock Search
Tools NewsCapitol TradesFollow the Money
Financial Wellbeing Retirement CalculatorInvestment CalculatorTax HarvestLoan Calculator
Event Calendar Market EventsEarningsStock SplitsUpgrades & Downgrades
Pricing

Account

Sign up freeLog in
My HoldingsAccountSubscribeLog out
    Sign up freeLog in
    My HoldingsAccountSubscribefrom $14.99/moLog out

    Home
    Research
    Latest high conviction ideaPick RankingFree ResearchCEO Central
    WatchlistsStock Search
    Tools
    NewsCapitol TradesFollow the Money
    Financial Wellbeing
    Retirement CalculatorInvestment CalculatorTax HarvestLoan Calculator
    Event Calendar
    Market EventsEarningsStock SplitsUpgrades & Downgrades
    Pricing
    SummaryChartsWatchlistScreenersIdeaAccount

    Sign up or log in for access

    Unlock Sunday research reports and your subscription. Free to create an account: no credit card needed to sign up.

    Sign up freeLog in
    Financial Services82/100

    This week’s research pick

    Sunday 30 August 2026

    Why now: The stock has moved back to new highs and held above its recent breakout level, which improves timing for a multi-year position. Fundamentally, Interactive Brokers benefits when market participation and customer balances stay healthy, which fits a quality-first market that still rewards cash-generative financial infrastructure.

    Upside: A reasonable multi-month path is a continuation move into the low $110s, roughly a 10% to 15% gain, if operating momentum and market activity remain supportive. Over a full year, upside can expand if earnings growth and net interest income remain resilient.

    Risks: A risk-off market or sharp drop in trading activity can pressure commissions and financing income. Regulatory changes or an operational control failure would be especially damaging for a brokerage and clearing business.

    Entry: Entry zone $97.77 to $98.72; hold above $97.77 on pullbacks; invalidation on a daily close below $88.92.

    Reasonable portfolio fit IBKR fits the quality-plus-early-momentum approach: it is a scaled, technology-driven brokerage with a durable cost advantage, and the move back to new highs supports timing for a longer-term hold. It also adds a different kind of cash-flow engine to the book, with earnings tied to customer activity and interest earned on client balances rather than to a single product cycle. It does add to Financial Services exposure alongside Chubb, but the drivers are different (brokerage activity and client cash economics versus insurance underwriting and reinvestment yields). To keep the portfolio balanced, watch that Financial Services doesn’t become too large and that the book doesn’t get overly tied to market activity staying elevated.

    Scorecard

    Read:Strong metricsSolid metricsSelectiveCautionUnfavourableN/A
    Scorecard82/100
    Company Detail
    Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
    IBKR - Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
    Price 50d 200d1Y · daily
    Price as at 28 August 2026
    $95.84
    Market cap$165.6B
    Quality and Fundamental Score (100)
    Breakout / Early-Momentum /2016/20
    Rev/EPS Momentum /2016/20
    Business Quality /1514/15
    Balance Sheet /1513/15
    Valuation /106/10
    Industry Relative Strength /107/10
    Macro / Sector Tailwind /1010/10
    Growth
    Cash runwayCash generative
    Revenue YoY+9.8%
    EPS YoY+28.3%
    FCF YoY+81.5%
    Gross margin89.8%
    Valuation & Trend
    Trailing P/E37.9x
    Forward P/E35.3x
    RSI (14d)57
    vs 50d SMA+3.9%
    Support cushion−7.2%
    Sentiment
    Wall Street verdictAligned
    News toneQuiet
    Dividend0.3%
    How are these colored?
    MetricStrong metricsSolid metricsSelectiveCautionUnfavourable
    Overall score≥ 8070-7960-6950-59< 50
    Business quality /15≥ 1210-118-96-7< 6
    Balance sheet /15≥ 1210-118-96-7< 6
    Market cap≥ $20B$5B-$20B$2B-$5B$1B-$2B< $1B
    Cash runway≥ 3 yr or cash generative1.5-3 yr0.75-1.5 yr0.25-0.75 yr< 0.25 yr
    Revenue YoY≥ 15%5-15%0-5%-5-0%< -5%
    EPS YoY≥ 20%5-20%0-5%-5-0%< -5%
    FCF YoY≥ 10%1-10%0-1%-5-0%< -5%
    Gross margin≥ 60%40-60%25-40%10-25%< 10%
    Trailing P/E< 1515-2525-3535-40> 40 or neg
    Forward P/E< 1515-2525-3535-40> 40 or neg
    RSI (14d)50-7045-50 or 70-7540-45 or 75-7830-40 or 78-80< 30 or > 80
    vs 50d SMA+2% to +15%0-2% or 15-25%-2-0% or 25-35%-3--2% or 35-40%< -3% or > 40%
    Support cushion2-10% above0-2%10-15%15-20%price below support
    Wall Street verdictAligned—Mixed—Disagrees
    News tonePositive—Neutral / Mixed—Negative
    DividendYield ≥ 2% & growingGrowingFlat payer ≥ 1%Low / flatCutting

    Detailed Analysis — Sunday 30 August 2026

    What they do
    Interactive Brokers operates a global electronic brokerage that executes and clears trades across stocks, options, futures, foreign exchange, bonds, and funds. It earns money from commissions, payment and clearing related economics, and net interest income on customer balances and margin lending.
    Leadership
    Milan Galik·CEO

    Milan Galik has been Chief Executive Officer since September 2019.

    Paul Jonathan Brody·CFO

    Paul Jonathan Brody serves as Chief Financial Officer of Interactive Brokers Group.

    Customers & notable contracts

    Receiver of capital expenditure: No — Revenue is driven mainly by trading activity and customer balances rather than customers buying physical equipment or building projects.

    Main customers

    • Individual investors and active traders (Use the platform for multi-asset trading and custody with a self-directed workflow.)
    • Institutional accounts (hedge funds, proprietary trading firms) (Use execution, financing, and prime brokerage style services.)
    • Financial advisors (Use advisor-oriented tools and custody to manage client accounts.)
    • Introducing brokers (Use white-labeled technology and back-office clearing while they own the end client relationship.)
    Summary thesis
    • Interactive Brokers is a scaled, technology-led brokerage whose business model has structural advantages in automation and global market access.
    • It is positioned to keep taking share with active traders, advisors, and introducing brokers, while also benefiting from customer cash balances and financing demand.
    • In a market that is paying for durable cash generation, it stands out as a higher-quality financial infrastructure name with a constructive long-term chart.
    Wall Street alignment
    ✓Wall Street: Aligned (3/4 signals positive)
    ✓
    Analyst consensus
    Buy (2.53, 19 analysts) · +10% upside
    ✓
    Institutional ownership
    89% institutions, insiders 2.7%
    ✓
    Short interest
    2.1% of float short · 1.8 d-to-cover
    •
    Smart money tape
    -1 net (acc 1 / dist 2, last 26d)
    Recent news
    No material news in the last 7 days.
    Dividends
    Yield (fwd)
    0.33%
    Latest (TTM)
    $0.33
    2025
    $0.30
    2024
    $0.21
    Payout ratio: 13%
    Technicals
    Price
    $95.84
    RSI (14d)
    57.3
    50d SMA
    $92.20
    200d SMA
    $78.29
    vs 50d SMA
    +3.9%
    vs 200d SMA
    +22.4%
    Support (swing low)
    $88.92 −7.2%
    40-day high (R) — breakout confirmed
    $97.77 +2.0%
    Close as of 2026-08-28.
    Score breakdown

    Scores 82 out of 100 — a solid overall grade. Sector fit, business quality, and balance sheet scored highest. Chart setup and earnings trend also helped. Relative strength versus its industry and valuation were fair but not standout drivers.

    Component scores are on the scorecard above.

    Momentum evidence
    • Price is at a fresh 52-week high and above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a rising 200-day trend.
    • The breakout has been confirmed by a hold above resistance, while the stock is not extremely extended versus the 50-day moving average, which keeps the long-term entry case credible even after the recent push.
    Fundamental evidence
    • The company is profitable with latest annual net income of $984.00M on $10.23B of revenue, and it shows very strong free cash flow of $15.74B.
    • Gross margin is high at 89.8%, consistent with a software-like, high operating leverage brokerage model.
    • A key watch item is the share count trend, with share change of +38.85% over five years, which can dilute per-share compounding if it persists.

    Cash runway: Cash generative (latest annual free cash flow is positive).

    Valuation view
    Valuation is not cheap on trailing earnings with a trailing price to earnings ratio of 38.81 and forward price to earnings ratio of 36.18. The multiple can be justified if earnings growth remains steady and the firm keeps gaining share, but returns will be more sensitive to any slowdown in market activity or net interest income than for lower-multiple financial peers.
    Macro tailwind
    Financial market activity and cash-balance economics: electronic brokers with scale tend to benefit from sustained participation and from interest earned on customer balances and margin lending.
    What to watch

    Upcoming (1–6 months)

    • Next quarterly earnings release and management commentary on account growth and net interest income.
    • Any regulatory developments affecting retail trading, margin, or payment and execution rules.

    Ongoing

    • Customer account growth and customer equity trends as indicators of share gains.
    • Net interest income sensitivity to benchmark rate changes and customer cash mix.
    • Price behavior relative to the 50-day moving average as a health check on the uptrend.
    Long-term case
    Over multiple years, the long-term driver is the steady shift toward electronic, multi-asset, global trading and custody with low unit costs. Interactive Brokers can compound by expanding institutional services, growing advisor and introducing broker channels, and improving the product set that keeps customers consolidating assets on the platform. If market participation remains structurally higher than prior decades, the firm’s operating leverage can translate that activity into durable earnings power.
    Risks & invalidation

    Risks

    • Sustained decline in trading activity and customer balances reduces commissions and financing income.
    • Regulatory changes that compress brokerage economics or raise compliance costs.
    • Operational, technology, or risk management failures that damage trust or trigger regulatory penalties.

    Breaks the thesis

    • Daily close back below $97.77 followed by failure to regain it within a short window.
    • Daily close below the 50-day moving average (about $92.03).
    Bottom line
    Long term Candidate: Interactive Brokers is a high-quality financial infrastructure business with real profitability, strong cash generation, and a model designed to scale. It fits a market that continues to reward durable earners, and the stock is acting well enough to support a multi-month to multi-year hold.

    For informational purposes only — not investment advice. Full disclaimer.

    Market regime

    ▲Bullish

    Stocks are in an uptrend right now — the S&P 500 is trading above both its 50- and 200-day moving averages. Momentum is on the bulls' side.

    • Sector leadership: Tech, Healthcare leading; Utilities, Industrials lagging.
    • Market breadth: mixed — gains are spread unevenly across the market.
    • Volatility: data unavailable right now.
    Sector Rotation Watch20d vs SPY
    ←$OutSPYIn$→
    XLKTechnology
    +2.9%
    XLBMaterials
    +2.5%
    XLVHealthcare
    +2.3%
    XLEEnergy
    +2.3%
    XLCCommunication
    +1.4%
    XLFFinancials
    -0.9%
    XLYCons. Discretionary
    -2.0%
    XLPCons. Staples
    -2.5%
    XLREReal Estate
    -4.3%
    XLIIndustrials
    -4.5%
    XLUUtilities
    -6.6%

    20-day return vs SPY (+3.0%). Longer bar = stronger relative move.

    Chatter box

    Combined Reddit + StockTwits buzz for prior published picks and names screened in the last 4 days. Sorted by total mentions (Reddit hot-post hits + StockTwits trending rank weight).

    1. TJXThe TJX Companies, Inc.1 mention
    2. GEVGE Vernova Inc.1 mention

    Earnings this week

    Wed Sep 2
    • AVGO—
    • GASS—

    Aug 31 – Sep 4, 2026 · 64 symbols · Prior published picks reporting this week.

    Pick history

    Latest 10 weekly picks (avg uses all 14). Full archive.

    • Score·Price
      PickS&PSector
    • Since May 24, 2026 · Avg · 14 picks
      ↑+0.9%↑+2.5%↑+1.4%
    • 68/100
      Aug 23 – $27.41→$26.25
      IDEAMember idea
      ↓-4.2%↑+0.7%↓-0.3%
      Editorial status: Active
      WildFire acquisition terms and debt load remain key risk; watch closing timeline.
    • 80/100
      Aug 16 – $283.13→$284.89
      IDEAMember idea
      ↑+0.6%↓-0.8%↓-5.2%
      Editorial status: Active
      Recent results were solid; watch demand for automation and consumables orders.
    • 89/100
      Aug 9 – $425.99→$368.10
      IDEAMember idea
      ↓-13.6%↓-0.5%↓-0.9%
      Editorial status: Active
      Next earnings September 2; watch AI chip demand and VMware software growth.
    • 77/100
      Aug 2 – $298.88→$291.93
      IDEAMember idea
      ↓-2.3%↑+1.8%↑+4.7%
      Editorial status: Active
      Steady cash flow and dividend; watch domain growth trends and pricing rules.
    • 83/100
      Jul 26 – $199.77→$217.55
      IDEAMember idea
      ↑+8.9%↑+4.0%↑+6.8%
      Editorial status: Active
      Latest quarter beat again; watch next-quarter guidance and supply meeting demand.
    • 89/100
      Jul 19 – $147.14→$140.70
      IDEAMember idea
      ↓-4.4%↑+3.4%↓-1.9%
      Editorial status: Active
      Raised 2026 outlook on strong leasing; watch rent growth and new supply.
    • 78/100
      Jul 12 – $199.56→$216.48
      IDEAMember idea
      ↑+8.5%↑+2.2%↑+6.1%
      Editorial status: Active
      New CEO appointment is a headline; watch 2026 outlook and tool demand.
    • 84/100
      Jul 5 – $228.18→$219.66
      IDEAMember idea
      ↓-3.7%↑+2.5%↓-4.6%
      Editorial status: Active
      Stericycle is now inside WM; watch integration savings and service quality.
    • 81/100
      Jun 28 – $341.34→$340.19
      IDEAMember idea
      ↓-0.3%↑+4.3%↑+7.7%
      Editorial status: Active
      Strong quarter and underwriting profits; watch storm losses and premium pricing.
    • 82/100
      Jun 21 – $181.63→$211.71
      IDEAMember idea
      ↑+16.6%↑+3.3%↓-2.4%
      Editorial status: Active
      Company raised 2026 outlook; watch engine deliveries and defense order pace.

    Near misses

    1 name with 3+ strong mechanical metrics and screening score ≥65 that did not make today's idea. Tap a ticker for the one-line note.

    Week in review

    Review: Aug 24–28, 2026 · Outlook: Aug 31 – Sep 4, 2026

    Prior week
    SPY +0.77%
    QQQ +1.43%
    IWM -0.74%
    DIA +0.31%
    1Y · dailyPrice50d200d

    Last week

    • Large-cap technology leadership; Nasdaq outperformed while small-cap stocks lagged.
    • Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh hawkish Jackson Hole tone; rate-hike odds rose and short-term Treasury yields climbed.
    • Artificial intelligence complex focus; Nvidia earnings beat helped sentiment despite late-week rate jitters.
    • Inflation data and rates remained central; markets weighed sticky price pressures against resilient growth.

    Week ahead

    • United States employment week; payrolls report Friday and related labor prints drive rate expectations.
    • Manufacturing and services surveys; fresh read on growth momentum after Jackson Hole repricing.
    • High-profile technology earnings; Broadcom, Dell Technologies, Snowflake, and Palo Alto Networks in focus.
    • Interest-rate sensitivity test; watch Treasury yield direction and equity multiple compression risk.
    Potentially Attractive Sector
    Information Technology

    If earnings follow-through stays firm, software and semiconductors can lead despite higher yields.

    Major risks
    • Upside payrolls surprise lifts Treasury yields.
    • Another hawkish Federal Reserve signal boosts hike probability.
    • Earnings misses from mega-cap technology suppliers.
    • Sharp U.S. dollar rally tightens financial conditions.
    • Volatility spike from crowded positioning in growth stocks.
    How research works

    Starting pool: S&P 500 (~500 names) plus up to 400 liquid NASDAQ-listed stocks outside the S&P (20-day average dollar volume ≥ $10M and market cap ≥ $2B). A mechanical momentum screen (bar-by-bar, no look-ahead) drops names without an early setup; survivors are ranked on a 100-point rubric and the top idea is selected. Only names on that day's list are eligible.

    Today: 5,393 names scanned (S&P + NASDAQ) → 45 in candidate pool → 25 finalists → 1 idea selected · built in 69.3s

    Universe & momentum screen

    Liquid NASDAQ supplement: up to 400 NASDAQ-listed names outside the S&P 500 with 20-day average dollar volume ≥ $10M and market cap ≥ $2B (same daily price database as the S&P names).

    Every symbol in the pool is scored on daily prices. Most are dropped in this step. Kept only if momentum just turned (composite score ≥ 25/100), including:

    • 200-day MA rising — the 200-day moving average must be pointing up on the daily chart (10-day slope)
    • 50-day reclaim — recent reclaim of the 50-day line; 50-day slope turning up
    • RSI (14) — roughly 45–65 (rising, not overbought)
    • Volume — recent 20-day average ≥ ~1.3× the prior 50-day pace
    • 52-week high — still has room (not chasing a blow-off top)
    • Returns — 20-day / 90-day gains modest, not already extended

    Names with a flat or falling 200-day moving average are excluded entirely. The highest-scoring survivors are ranked; only the top 25 go forward. Today's idea is chosen from that short list using the rubric below.

    100-point rubric

    Each finalist gets a score out of 100 (see scorecard, e.g. 84/100):

    Componentpts
    Early momentum / breakout20
    Revenue & earnings20
    Business quality15
    Balance sheet15
    Valuation10
    Industry relative strength10
    Macro / sector10
    Total100

    Fundamentals and macro come from web research; red flags can cap the total. Afterward, scores are clamped and re-ranked; the published idea must show a minimum breakout score.

    Wall Street confirmation

    Wall Street alignment is an independent confirmation, not part of the 100-point rubric. Analyst ratings, institutional ownership, short interest, and accumulation/distribution tape are pulled from market data only for the final idea, after that name is already selected. The published #1 must show Aligned (3+/4) — at least 3 of four signals positive with none negative (analyst consensus, institutional ownership, short interest, smart-money tape). The rest of the universe is never scored on this step. Mixed or Disagrees on a backup rank is fine; those names cannot take #1.

    Screening notes — all 25 candidates reviewed
    • PLRZ (28/100) — Early technical improvement, but it is a pre-revenue biotechnology name with net losses and negative free cash flow, which fails the long-term quality bar.
    • SIM (45/100) — Very cheap looking valuation on earnings, but latest annual free cash flow is negative and steel is highly cyclical, so it does not clear the durable quality filter for a top pick.
    • EPSN (44/100) — Heartbeat breakout is confirmed, but the latest annual net income is negative, which caps long-term scoring and makes it ineligible for a top long-term quality selection.
    • TWO (33/100) — Strong volume but the mortgage real estate investment trust model shows latest annual net loss and negative free cash flow, and leverage sensitivity is high in a rate-uncertain regime.
    • CTVA (68/100) — Durable agriculture inputs franchise with profits and free cash flow, but valuation is not cheap and the chart is still below resistance.
    • CKX (46/100) — Profitable with a cash heavy balance sheet, but it is extremely small and illiquid with limited fundamental visibility, so it is not suitable as a flagship long-term candidate.
    • AXIL (40/100) — Profitable but essentially no free cash flow and severe dilution over five years, plus weak industry relative strength versus technology.
    • UGI (66/100) — Steady utility cash flows and sector leadership in the snapshot, but leverage and rate sensitivity keep it below the top slot.
    • AGCO (55/100) — Profitable and reasonably valued, but gross margin is thin and the chart is not near confirmation, while analyst stance is only hold.
    • TRMD (64/100) — Profitable and cheap with a confirmed move, but shipping is cycle driven and less durable as a long-term quality compounder.
    • WEAV (50/100) — Strong volume and relative strength, but the company is loss making on net income, which mechanically caps long-term scoring despite positive free cash flow.
    • CNH (54/100) — Improving chart and strong industry relative strength, but high leverage and low returns in the fact pack reduce long-term quality confidence.
    • CFFI (58/100) — Very strong technical confirmation and low earnings multiple, but it lacks broad Wall Street coverage and its bank financial structure metrics look messy in the fact pack.
    • HAFN (56/100) — Confirmed move and attractive cash generation, but thin gross margin and heavy dilution over five years reduce long-term per-share durability.
    • HOLX (70/100) — High quality medtech with strong margins and cash flow, but it is already extended and industry relative strength is unresolved in the universe.
    • CENT (59/100) — Good free cash flow and a supportive target upside, but gross margin is only 31.1% and industry relative strength is n/a, while the stock remains in a base.
    • SPNT (52/100) — Profitable and cheap, but the chart has weak volume and the balance sheet signals in the fact pack are not clean enough for a top long-term quality pick.
    • HNNA (53/100) — Cash rich asset manager with a high dividend yield, but very small size and limited coverage reduce confidence in the Wall Street alignment gate for a top pick.
    • AAPL (63/100) — Best-in-class business quality and profits, but the chart is not confirmed and sector relative strength is lagging, while valuation is demanding and upside to consensus target is modest.
    • NCEW (18/100) — Extreme industry relative strength on the chart, but it is a loss maker with very weak gross margin and minimal cash, which fails the long-term quality and balance sheet requirements.
    • GRBK (71/100) — Profitable, strong free cash flow, reasonable valuation, and an improving chart in a housing undersupply theme, making it the best long-term candidate in today’s universe.
    • ALCO (25/100) — Large net loss and deeply negative gross margin make the fundamentals unacceptable for a long-term quality momentum approach.
    • MSOS (30/100) — Technicals are improving but it is an exchange traded fund with no company fundamentals in the fact pack, so it cannot be scored as a durable single-stock long-term candidate.
    • INR (48/100) — Confirmed move and low earnings multiple, but negative free cash flow and multiple data inconsistencies in the fact pack force a conservative long-term score.
    • SND (49/100) — Small profit and good free cash flow, but very thin gross margin and a negative analyst target upside make it unsuitable for a top long-term selection.
    Sources consulted
    IBKR — Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
    • FMP Fundamental Fact Pack for IBKR (provided in prompt)
    • Interactive Brokers Group Form 10-Q for quarter ended June 30, 2026 (SEC EDGAR)
    • Interactive Brokers Group DEF 14A filed March 11, 2026 (SEC EDGAR) for CEO succession reference
    • Interactive Brokers institutional client descriptions (Interactive Brokers website: Institutions page)
    • Interactive Brokers Annual Report filed 2026 (SEC EDGAR annual report document referenced in search results)
    • Interactive Brokers media release describing prime brokerage services (Interactive Brokers press release)
    Chatter box — Reddit + StockTwits
    • Reddit hot-post title scan (r/SecurityAnalysis, r/Bogleheads, r/investing, r/stocks, r/ValueInvesting) — snapshot 2026-08-29 13:05:04 UTC
    • StockTwits symbol message streams (recent messages per ticker) — snapshot 2026-08-29 13:05:04 UTC
    Glossary

    Plain-English definitions for every metric, signal, and label used in this report. Click a category below to expand.

    Scorecard & ranking rubric
    Overall score
    Composite 0-100. Sum of the seven rubric components in the Quality and Fundamental Score (100) section (each clamped to its max after the report is generated). The headline pill and the Total row in the score breakdown must match this sum. Unprofitable names (latest annual net income ≤ 0) are also hard-capped at 50/100 after component caps.
    Classification
    Long term Candidate only — every published idea is a multi-month to multi-year Investment thesis. Tactical trades and Hybrid setups are not published.
    Breakout / Early-Momentum (/20)
    Mechanical score from live tape after the report is generated: pre-breakout composite, heartbeat confirmation, and hold bars. Replaces the preliminary estimate. Rewards confirmed breakouts; penalises weak or unconfirmed setups.
    Rev/EPS Momentum (/20)
    Qualitative score for revenue and earnings trajectory — acceleration, beats/misses, guidance tone, and whether growth is durable vs one-off. Not the same as the mechanical Revenue YoY / EPS YoY rows (those are raw fiscal-year trends). When latest annual net income ≤ 0, this component is mechanically capped at 0/20.
    Business Quality (/15)
    Qualitative score from filings, earnings calls, and peer context (moat, durability, management, etc.), then mechanically capped from latest gross margin: ≥ 60% no cap; 40-60% max 11; 25-40% max 8; 10-25% max 5; < 10% max 3. Grid colors: ≥ 12 Strong metrics, 10-11 Solid metrics, 8-9 Selective, 6-7 Caution, < 6 Unfavourable.
    Balance Sheet (/15)
    Qualitative score from debt, liquidity, and capital-structure evidence, then mechanically capped from profitability: latest annual net income ≤ 0 → max 3/15; profitable but free cash flow ≤ 0 → max 8/15. Cash runway on the Growth rows is display-only and does not add its own points. Grid colors use the same 0-15 bands as Business Quality.
    Valuation (/10)
    Qualitative score for whether the stock is reasonably priced vs its growth, history, and peers — not just the mechanical Forward P/E cell. Penalises "priced for perfection" or opaque accounting.
    Industry Relative Strength (/10)
    “Is the money still in the neighbourhood?” Mechanical score from the stock's own 20-day and 90-day price return vs its Select Sector SPDR ETF's return over the same window. Above 50 on the underlying 0-100 reading means the stock is leading its own sector; below 50 means it is lagging while the sector's money has moved elsewhere. 0 when the sector can't be resolved. Reports published before 2026-07-01 show a Chatter / Attention score here instead (an earlier, discontinued social-buzz metric).
    Macro Tailwind (/10)
    How well the name fits active macro/sector themes in the report (data-center buildout, reshoring, healthcare innovation, defense spending, etc.) and the market-context section. Weighted heavily in ranking for long-term ideas.
    Score breakdown card
    On each detail card, a short plain-English summary of the overall score — what helped and what held it back. The full component scores live in Quality and Fundamental Score (100) on the scorecard above.
    Today's idea scorecard
    Decision brief
    The labeled block under the scorecard: Why now, Upside, Risks, and Entry — actionable only. Why now is the fundamental/macro case (not a full technical stat sheet). Preferred entry is breakout confirmation above R with volume — even when the chart has not confirmed yet. Detailed Analysis holds thesis, evidence, and risks without repeating the same sentences.
    Portfolio fit (Sunday)
    After the decision brief on Sunday editions, a short editorial sense check against prior Sunday ideas still in the book (sector/theme overlap, whether the new name complements the quality-momentum portfolio). Editorial only — no automatic ticker swap or hard sector caps.
    What it is
    The scorecard for today's idea: the decision brief, then a heat map of key metrics (same color bands as screening). Company Detail section header (tickers), then company name (with logo) and live price; ticker links jump to detail cards.
    Scorecard rows (judged)
    Overall score (top of scorecard) plus the Quality and Fundamental Score (100) section — all seven components that sum to the headline score. Market cap sits under Current price; Cash runway is under Growth. Other Growth and Valuation rows are computed market and financial metrics, not part of the 100-point total.
    Valuation & trend rows
    Trailing P/E, Forward P/E (computed), RSI, vs 50d SMA, Support cushion (mechanical technicals). Market cap is under Current price on the scorecard.
    Growth rows
    Cash runway plus Revenue YoY, EPS YoY, FCF YoY, Gross margin — computed from reported financials (see Fundamentals). Colors use fixed % thresholds, not peer-relative ranking.
    Sentiment rows
    Wall Street verdict (aggregated analyst + institutional + short + tape signals), News tone (post-research enrichment), Dividend (yield/trend for payers).
    Origin & discovery pills
    pre-breakout
    This symbol ranked in the mechanical daily pre-breakout scan (PB score). Setup-focused, not a buy signal by itself.
    buzz
    Flagged in the social chatter scan (Reddit + StockTwits volume). Discovery signal only.
    HC (high conviction)
    In both the pre-breakout scan and the chatter scan — overlap names get priority in the candidate universe.
    PB score (0-100)
    Mechanical pre-breakout composite from daily OHLCV: 200-day MA must be rising on the daily chart; plus 50-day reclaim, RSI zone, 20d/90d return, volume, distance from 52-week high. ≥ 60 is a strong setup. Shown as "PB" in the universe table — distinct from the qualitative Breakout /20 rubric points.
    Chatter score (0-100)
    Mechanical buzz from Reddit (r/SecurityAnalysis, r/Bogleheads, r/investing, r/stocks, r/ValueInvesting) and StockTwits message volume. Discovery only — sources BUZZ candidate names and feeds the universe "Chatter" audit column. Does not feed a score_breakdown rubric component (see Industry Relative Strength, which replaced the old Chatter /5 score on 2026-07-01).
    IndRS (0-100, mechanical)
    Industry relative strength shown per candidate in the universe: the stock's own 20d/90d return vs its Select Sector SPDR ETF's return over the same window (shown with the ETF ticker and 20-day alpha in parentheses). Feeds the Industry Relative Strength /10 rubric component — see Scorecard glossary above.
    Technicals
    Price (live)
    Last daily close as of the date shown on the Technicals card. Also shown under each ticker in today's idea scorecard header.
    RSI (14d)
    Wilder's Relative Strength Index over 14 days. 30-70 is neutral; > 70 overbought; < 30 oversold. Quality-momentum sweet spot: ~50-70 and rising.
    50d / 200d SMA
    Simple moving average of the closing price over 50 or 200 trading days. Price above the 50-day = short-term uptrend; above the 200-day = long-term uptrend. Selection requires the 200-day line itself to be rising (10-day slope on the daily chart).
    vs 50d SMA / vs 200d SMA
    Current price as % above (+) or below (-) the moving average.
    20d / 90d return
    Price change over the last 20 or 90 trading days. Used in the mechanical PB scan and the candidate-universe table (20d ret). Extended 20d gains can mean "late" for a breakout entry.
    vs 52-week high
    How far below the 52-week high the stock trades (negative % = below the high). Early-momentum setups often sit 5-25% below the high — room to run, not chasing a new high.
    Support / Resistance
    Probable floor (support) or ceiling (resistance) from recent swing lows/highs, with 52-week extremes as fallback. Labels show the source (e.g. swing low). When a 40-day high (R) is shown, that is the mechanical breakout gate — use it for entry/confirmation; the next swing high is a further upside ceiling, not the break trigger.
    Heartbeat pattern
    Mechanical early-breakout setup on the daily chart — the pattern shown on the home page. Price consolidates under resistance R (the prior 40-session high), breaks above R on a daily close, then holds above R for at least one session ("heartbeat" confirmation). Support S is the low of the same 40-day window. Names with a confirmed heartbeat (hb=Y) or a fresh 50-day moving-average reclaim enter the candidate shortlist; unconfirmed breaks use break-then-hold entry guidance until confirmation. Feeds the Breakout / Early-Momentum rubric.
    Support cushion
    Distance from current price to nearest support, in %. Heat-map bands: 2-10% above = Strong metrics; below support = Unfavourable. Detail-card colors follow the same scale.
    Wall Street alignment
    Independent confirmation (final idea only)
    Analyst, institutional, short, and tape signals are fetched after the final idea is locked — they are not inputs to the 100-point rubric or the mechanical momentum screen. Only the final ideas get this check, so agreement with Street positioning is a separate validation: Aligned supports the thesis; Mixed or Disagrees flags tension to read in the risks.
    Analyst consensus
    Average broker rating on a 1-5 scale (1 = Strong Buy, 5 = Sell), plus the implied % upside to the average price target. "Buy (2.1, 21 analysts) · +15% upside" means 21 brokers average to a Buy rating and see ~15% upside.
    Institutional ownership
    % of shares outstanding held by mutual funds, pensions, and asset managers (13F filers). High = "the smart money is already in." < 30% in a small/mid-cap stock can be a red flag.
    Insider ownership
    % held by officers/directors. Very low insider stake can mean weak alignment; very high can mean low float.
    Short interest
    % of the public float currently sold short. Days-to-cover = how many days of average volume it would take shorts to close their positions. > 10% short or > 5 d-to-cover is meaningful bearish positioning (but also sets up potential short squeezes).
    Smart money tape
    O'Neil-style accumulation/distribution count over the last ~25 trading days. Counts up-days on rising volume as "accumulation" and down-days on rising volume as "distribution". A net positive number means institutions are quietly buying.
    Alignment verdict
    Aggregated read of all four signals: Aligned (Wall Street agrees with our idea), Mixed (signals split), or Disagrees (Wall Street is bearish despite our idea).
    Dividends
    Yield (forward)
    Annualized dividend ÷ current share price, expressed as a percentage. The income return you'd earn at today's price if the dividend is held constant for a year.
    Latest (TTM)
    Total dividend cash per share paid over the trailing twelve months. The current annualized rate, regardless of where you are in the calendar.
    Payout ratio
    Annual dividends ÷ annual earnings. Under 60% is healthy with room to keep raising; over 100% means they pay out more than they earn (dividend-cut risk).
    Prior years (dividend history)
    Cash dividends per share for the last two full fiscal years — green tint if the latest annualized rate is above the prior year, red if cutting.
    Fundamentals (mechanical)
    Sparkline bars
    Five-year history from reported financials: Revenue, Free cash flow, Net income, EPS (diluted), Gross margin %. Bars are year-over-year % change per fiscal year.
    Revenue YoY
    Latest fiscal year revenue vs prior year, %. ≥ 15% Strong metrics in the heat map; negative = Unfavourable.
    EPS YoY
    Diluted EPS growth year-over-year. More volatile than revenue; reflects the bottom line.
    FCF YoY
    Free cash flow YoY (operating cash flow minus capex). Harder to engineer than earnings.
    Gross margin
    Latest fiscal-year gross profit ÷ revenue, %. ≥ 60% is strong on the heat map; under 10% is unfavourable.
    Scorecard notes (Note N)
    When a Growth row is yellow or red, a small Note N chip appears on that scorecard line. Click to open a popup with the full explanation.
    Trailing / Forward P/E
    Trailing = price ÷ last 12 months EPS; Forward = price ÷ consensus next-12-month EPS from market data. Both use the same scorecard bands (< 15 Strong metrics, etc.).
    Market cap
    Equity market value — context for size and liquidity. Scorecard bands: ≥ $20B Strong metrics, $5B–$20B Solid metrics, $2B–$5B Selective, $1B–$2B Caution, < $1B Unfavourable.
    Cash runway
    Mechanical estimate in years: cash and equivalents ÷ latest annual free cash flow burn (only when FCF is negative). Uses the most recent quarterly balance sheet cash from reported balance-sheet cash and the latest fiscal-year FCF. Shows Cash generative when latest FCF is positive. Bands: ≥ 3 yr Strong metrics, 1.5–3 yr Solid metrics, 0.75–1.5 yr Selective, 0.25–0.75 yr Caution, < 0.25 yr Unfavourable.
    Detailed analysis cards
    What they do
    Plain-English business description (products, customers, how it makes money) — no thesis.
    Leadership
    Current C-suite (CEO, CFO, and COO when the company has one): name and role side by side, tenure in role visible by default; expand for full career bio.
    Customers & notable contracts
    Main customers or buyer segments, notable contract values when verified, and whether the company is a receiver of customer capital expenditure (paid when buyers build infrastructure).
    Summary thesis
    2-4 sentence investment case — unique vs the scorecard decision brief and Bottom line.
    Momentum evidence
    Interprets live technicals (trend quality, extension risk); must align with the Technicals block but should not repeat every statistic from the scorecard.
    Fundamental evidence
    Narrative on revenue, earnings, margins, free cash flow, and balance-sheet facts, plus the sparkline charts below it. Trailing/Forward P/E and market cap are on the Scorecard only. If a major chart metric looks weak (e.g. negative free cash flow), the text should explain why the idea still qualifies.
    Valuation view
    Qualitative write-up on valuation vs history and peers (complements mechanical P/E).
    Macro tailwind
    Which macro/sector story the name fits.
    What to watch
    Upcoming catalysts (1–6 months) and ongoing metrics to track — one section, two sub-lists.
    Long-term case
    Multi-year business drivers; often "n/a" for Trade-only. Distinct from Macro tailwind.
    Risks & invalidation
    Threats to the thesis, then specific break conditions (including technical invalidation). Replaces separate Key risks and Thesis invalidation blocks.
    Bottom line
    Plain-English closing take: time frame, what matters, main swing factor — not a yes/no answer to 'is it a buy?'; no repeat of thesis paragraph or scorecard statistics.
    Candidate universe screen
    Purpose
    Every name fed into today's research before today's idea is chosen. The full metric grid is omitted from the published report for readability.
    Near misses
    Sidebar card below Research history: non-selected names with ≥3 mechanical green-band metrics (same rules as the scorecard). Tap a ticker for the screening note and TradingView link.
    Research history
    Sidebar track record of prior Sunday weekly #1 ideas only (Mon–Sat daily runs excluded). Shows publication→current price, return vs SPY and sector ETF, and Editorial status: Active with a brief technical or thesis note. Picks are tracked as ongoing buy-and-hold ideas by default rather than being automatically sold on moving-average breaks. Full archive: deep_research/weekly-issue.html.
    Research archive
    Standalone page listing every cached daily #1 with score, classification, cache file size, generated/published UTC, fresh vs cached run, and link to the HTML snapshot. Sunday rows are highlighted as weekly editions.
    Screening notes (collapsible)
    Per-ticker one-line rationale from candidates_evaluated — expand to audit all screened names. ⭐ marks names that made today's idea.
    Market context & risk
    Market regime
    Top-of-sidebar verdict — Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish — from SPY trend (50-day / 200-day moving averages and RSI). Below the badge: one plain sentence plus three bullets — sector leadership (Tech, Financials, Energy, Healthcare, Industrials, Utilities vs the index), market breadth (equal-weight RSP vs cap-weight SPY), and volatility (VIX level/direction plus Risk on / Risk off / Mixed). Computed mechanically at publish time; independent of idea ranking.
    Week in review
    Weekly recap of the prior Mon–Fri session and outlook for the week ahead. Anchored to the most recent Sunday: a Wednesday run uses the same week boundaries as Sunday. Cached per week; does not affect idea ranking. Week ahead includes Potentially Attractive Sector and major risks.
    Potentially Attractive Sector
    Forward-looking week-ahead call from the Week in review section (one GICS-style sector plus a short rationale). Not tied to Sector Rotation Watch — that chart shows recent 20-day price strength vs SPY; this label is where leadership might go if macro lines up.
    Research sense check
    After each run, compares today's #1 idea to the prior 5 daily caches. Shows plurality vote, aligned vs dissent, and prior daily tickers. On Sundays only, the published weekly edition may replace the initial Sunday idea with the plurality winner from the last 5 days plus today (see Weekly edition). Wall Street analyst fields may be carried forward from the last good day when today's market-data fetch is empty (noted on the scorecard).
    Weekly edition (Sunday)
    Subscriber-facing idea on Sundays: plurality vote across the last 5 calendar days plus today's research run. Each candidate is checked for material news since its card date (e.g. Friday after-hours) before publish. First passing name wins; if the vote leader fails, the next eligible name is tried. If all fail, Sunday's initial idea is kept. Disable consensus: DEEP_RESEARCH_SUNDAY_WEEKLY_CONSENSUS=0. Disable thesis gate: DEEP_RESEARCH_WEEKLY_THESIS_CHECK=0.
    Chatter box
    Top social-attention names limited to prior published ideas and tickers screened in the candidate universe over the last few days (default 4). Combined Reddit + StockTwits mention count (summed), sorted high to low.
    Earnings this week
    Scheduled earnings (BMO/AMC) Mon–Fri for prior published ideas that report in that window. Sorted by size within each day; today's idea highlighted.
    Sector rotation
    Sector Rotation Watch under Market regime: a mechanical chart of all 11 sector SPDR ETFs vs SPY over the last 20 trading days. The guide shows ← $ Out (left) and In $ → (right). Green bars right = relative inflow / leadership; red bars left = relative outflow. Today's idea sector is highlighted when mappable to an ETF.
    Key themes (sidebar)
    Combined deck of macro themes from the main research pass and the weekly review, rendered inside the Week in review card.
    Sources consulted
    Every research and news source used for today's idea, grouped by ticker, plus Reddit and StockTwits for the Chatter box. News links open the original article.
    News
    Sentiment (positive / neutral / mixed / negative)
    Aggregated tone of recent news for the ticker over the configured lookback window (default 7 days). Compiled after today's idea is finalized, so news cannot influence selection.
    Impact (high / medium / low)
    How material the news item is to the investment thesis. High = potentially thesis-changing; low = noise.
    Category
    Earnings, Guidance, Product, M&A, Regulatory, Macro, Analyst Action, etc. — used to filter the news block visually.
    Heat map color bands
    Strong metrics
    Top-tier on this metric; supports a positive research view.
    Solid metrics
    Solid; supports the thesis without being exceptional.
    Selective
    Middle band — monitor; neither a clear strength nor a red flag.
    Caution
    Below average; worth flagging in the thesis.
    Unfavourable
    Red flag; needs explicit explanation in thesis or it shouldn't have been selected.
    N/A
    Not applicable or data unavailable (e.g. Dividend grade for a non-paying stock; RSI when there's not enough price history).
    Important disclaimer

    Picksmith provides information, analysis, opinions, and tools for general informational and educational purposes only. Nothing on Picksmith should be considered investment, financial, legal, tax, or other professional advice. Picksmith does not account for individual objectives, financial circumstances, risk tolerance, or personal needs. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Picksmith is not a registered broker-dealer, securities dealer, investment adviser, investment bank, or financial adviser.

    Picksmith

    Research

    • Latest high conviction idea
    • Pick Ranking
    • Free Research
    • CEO Central

    Tools

    • News
    • Capitol Trades
    • Follow the Money
    • Stock Search

    Financial Wellbeing

    • Retirement Calculator
    • Investment Calculator
    • Tax Harvest
    • Loan Calculator

    Event Calendar

    • Market Events
    • Earnings
    • Stock Splits
    • Upgrades & Downgrades

    Company

    • Pricing
    • About
    • Contact

    Profile

    • Sign up free
    • My Holdings
    • Account
    TermsPrivacyData protectionBrokerageRefunds

    For informational and educational purposes only. This is not investment advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

    © 2026 PicksmithSunday, August 30, 2026